Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d
- From: Arthur de Jong <arthur [at] arthurdejong.org>
- To: nss-pam-ldapd-users <nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 11:17:40 +0100
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 14:00 -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: > After some extra testing, that compiles on gcc-4.9 with no warnings, > but gcc-4.8 warns that '%zu' is not supported before c99. Attached is > another updated patch to use casts to silence the warning on > (hopefully) all platforms. Thanks, I've applied this patch. -- -- arthur - arthur@arthurdejong.org - http://arthurdejong.org/ --
-- To unsubscribe send an email to nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Tim Rice
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Lukas Slebodnik
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Patrick McLean
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Patrick McLean
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Arthur de Jong
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Patrick McLean
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Jakub Hrozek
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Patrick McLean
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Tim Rice
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Lukas Slebodnik
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d,
Tim Rice
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d