Re: [nssldap] release 0.2 of nss-ldapd

[Howard Chu <hyc [at] highlandsun.com>]

David Houlder wrote:
> Arthur de Jong wrote:
> ...
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, David Houlder wrote:
> ...
> > > (Having said that, I think the current signal handling could be fixed 
> > > by blocking SIGPIPE with pthread_sigmask() and then "soaking up" any 
> > > pending SIGPIPEs before return with sigwait())
> > Any pointers to do this in a safe way? Also would compiling and linking 
> > the NSS module with -pthread cause any extra overhead for non-threaded 
> > applications?
>
> Here's my idea. Not tested on any platform yet.

You need a non-threaded version of the same solution, using sigprocmask. Most 
likely you could use dlopen/dlsym to determine which to use dynamically at runtime.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/