Re: [nss-pam-ldapd] proposed patch for mutexing the daemon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
Re: [nss-pam-ldapd] proposed patch for mutexing the daemon
- From: Arthur de Jong <arthur [at] arthurdejong.org>
- To: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
- Subject: Re: [nss-pam-ldapd] proposed patch for mutexing the daemon
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:04:59 +0100
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:14 +0100, Jan Schampera wrote:
> Followup on a private email conversation with Arthur about daemon mutex:
>
> >> - use the same to implement a --check option
>
> Attached is a patch that kinda implements a --check option to be used by
> the user or from shell scripts.
Thanks for the excellent patch. I only made some small changes. I
renamed the function to is_locked() (and inverted the returned values)
and I moved some of the logging around. I also added more logging when
in debugging mode.
Thanks again.
--
-- arthur - arthur@arthurdejong.org - http://arthurdejong.org --
--
To unsubscribe send an email to
nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see
http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users