Re: [nss-pam-ldapd] proposed patch for mutexing the daemon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
Re: [nss-pam-ldapd] proposed patch for mutexing the daemon
- From: Jan Schampera <jan.schampera [at] web.de>
- To: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
- Reply-to: jan.schampera [at] web.de
- Subject: Re: [nss-pam-ldapd] proposed patch for mutexing the daemon
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:44:31 +0100
Arthur de Jong schrieb:
> Thanks for the excellent patch. I only made some small changes. I
> renamed the function to is_locked() (and inverted the returned values)
> and I moved some of the logging around. I also added more logging when
> in debugging mode.
No idea if it's excellent :) I wonder if it should be used in the
initscript instead of the kill -0 approach (status). Dunno the Debian
rules for that.
TheBonsai
--
To unsubscribe send an email to
nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see
http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users
