Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
- From: Arthur de Jong <arthur [at] arthurdejong.org>
- To: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:49:20 +0200
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 14:17 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > Thanks for pointing that out. I only checked the strtouid/strtogid calls > which was wrong. > > A new patch is attached. Looks good, please commit. Thanks. -- -- arthur - arthur@arthurdejong.org - http://arthurdejong.org --
-- To unsubscribe send an email to nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/
- [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls,
Jakub Hrozek
- Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls,
Arthur de Jong
- Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls,
Jakub Hrozek
- Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls, Arthur de Jong
- Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls,
Jakub Hrozek
- Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls,
Arthur de Jong
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls