Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]

From: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek [at] redhat.com>
To: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:55:16 +0200

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:49:20PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 14:17 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Thanks for pointing that out. I only checked the strtouid/strtogid calls
> > which was wrong.
> > 
> > A new patch is attached.
> 
> Looks good, please commit. Thanks.
> 

Done. Thank you for the review.
-- 
To unsubscribe send an email to
nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see
http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/

[PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls, Jakub Hrozek
- Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls, Arthur de Jong
  - Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls, Jakub Hrozek
    - Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls, Arthur de Jong
      - Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls, Jakub Hrozek

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
Next by Date: nslcd: ldap_result() timed out
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use an explicit base of 10 for strtouid()/strtogid() calls
Next by thread: nslcd: ldap_result() timed out