Re: Requirement for NSLCD
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
Re: Requirement for NSLCD
- From: Liam Hopkins <we.hopkins [at] gmail.com>
- To: "Sotomayor, Vicente (ITD)" <vicente.sotomayor [at] state.ma.us>
- Cc: "nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org" <nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org>
- Subject: Re: Requirement for NSLCD
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:57:04 -0400
On 07/18/13 at 03:38pm, Sotomayor, Vicente (ITD) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:11:07PM -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am attempting to configure LDAP auth on a RHEL/CentOS6 environment without
> > running nslcd; the support I have received from redhat user forums thus far
> > indicates that they no longer support this. I see the fact that
> > nss-pam-ldapd
> > can be built without nslcd and the following quote:
> >
> > > The three parts (NSS module, PAM module, and nslcd server) can be build
> > > separately and are not tied together. This means that for instance you
> > can
> > > still use pam_ldap and use the NSS module from nss-pam-ldapd.
> >
> > However, the details of the architecture as I understand this would make
> > such a
> > setup not work. It may be worth noting I have a completely working LDAP
> > solution that works on my RHEL5/CentOS5 boxes, with TLS and pam_ldap.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your assistance
>
> nslcd is currently supported in RH 6.
Thanks. I don't want to run NSLCD. Thus "without running nslcd".
--
William
--
To unsubscribe send an email to
nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see
http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/
- Re: Requirement for NSLCD, (continued)