lists.arthurdejong.org

[PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]

From: Patrick McLean <chutzpah [at] gentoo.org>
To: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
Subject: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:55:22 -0700

In several places the code uses a %d format to print a size_t variable.
On amd64 at least size_t is an unsigned long, so use %lu instead.

Attachment: 0011-cleanup-format-warnings-about-size_t.patch
Description: Text Data

-- 
To unsubscribe send an email to
nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see
http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/

[PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Patrick McLean

Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Lukas Slebodnik
- Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Tim Rice
  - Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Lukas Slebodnik
    - Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d, Patrick McLean

Prev by Date: [PATCH] don't let the oom killer kill nslcd
Next by Date: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: comparison of static array to null pointer
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] don't let the oom killer kill nslcd
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] warnings cleanup: size_t should be formatted %lu rather than %d