Re: small myldap.c patch
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]Re: small myldap.c patch
- From: Robert Brooks <robert.brooks [at] reporo.com>
- To: Arthur de Jong <arthur [at] arthurdejong.org>
- Cc: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
- Subject: Re: small myldap.c patch
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:20:07 -0700
Yes, I eventually came to this conclusion, at first the debugging and openldap logging had me scared :-s
Thanks for the responses.On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Arthur de Jong <arthur [at] arthurdejong.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 12:53 -0700, Robert Brooks wrote:
> My other question next question is, why aren't other tls options set
> in myldap.c, for example tls_ciphers, tls_cacert etc? I see them set
> in cfg.c...
Some options are set globally (ldap_set_option(NULL,...) in cfg.c and
some on the connection (ldap_set_option(ld,...) in myldap.c because
otherwise they are not always correctly picked up.
I think this also depends on which TLS library is used. The current
situation is a bit magical but at least it works ;)
Some background can be found here:
https://bugs.debian.org/525605
--
Robert Brooks
Head of Systems
Reporo
Tel: +1 (415) 758-2220
http://www.reporo.com
World's Largest & Most Lucrative Mobile Ad Network
Head of Systems
Reporo
Tel: +1 (415) 758-2220
http://www.reporo.com
World's Largest & Most Lucrative Mobile Ad Network
-- To unsubscribe send an email to nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/
- small myldap.c patch,
Robert Brooks
- Re: small myldap.c patch,
Arthur de Jong
- Re: small myldap.c patch,
Robert Brooks
- Re: small myldap.c patch,
Arthur de Jong
- Re: small myldap.c patch, Robert Brooks
- Re: small myldap.c patch,
Arthur de Jong
- Re: small myldap.c patch,
Robert Brooks
- Re: small myldap.c patch,
Arthur de Jong
- Prev by Date: Re: small myldap.c patch
- Next by Date: Is a search result necessary for a successful bind?
- Previous by thread: Re: small myldap.c patch
- Next by thread: Is a search result necessary for a successful bind?