Re: Problem with case filtering in nss-pam-ldapd
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
Re: Problem with case filtering in nss-pam-ldapd
- From: Arthur de Jong <arthur [at] arthurdejong.org>
- To: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
- Subject: Re: Problem with case filtering in nss-pam-ldapd
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:48:57 +0200
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:13 -0400, Matthew L. Dailey wrote:
> I agree that this is probably the best way to do this, but the
> implementation is a bit more than I can take on at the moment. This
> could get complicated fast, especially if this new "lower" map
> function can take arbitrary bits of map text and multiple attributes.
FWIW, version 0.8.7 of nss-pam-ldapd contains the lower() and upper()
attribute mapping functionality in the pynslcd implementation of nslcd.
--
-- arthur - arthur@arthurdejong.org - http://arthurdejong.org --
--
To unsubscribe send an email to
nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see
http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/
- Re: Problem with case filtering in nss-pam-ldapd, (continued)
