Re: Requirement for NSLCD
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
Re: Requirement for NSLCD
- From: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek [at] redhat.com>
- To: nss-pam-ldapd-users [at] lists.arthurdejong.org
- Subject: Re: Requirement for NSLCD
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:35:58 +0200
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:11:07PM -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am attempting to configure LDAP auth on a RHEL/CentOS6 environment without
> running nslcd; the support I have received from redhat user forums thus far
> indicates that they no longer support this. I see the fact that nss-pam-ldapd
> can be built without nslcd and the following quote:
>
> > The three parts (NSS module, PAM module, and nslcd server) can be build
> > separately and are not tied together. This means that for instance you can
> > still use pam_ldap and use the NSS module from nss-pam-ldapd.
>
> However, the details of the architecture as I understand this would make such
> a
> setup not work. It may be worth noting I have a completely working LDAP
> solution that works on my RHEL5/CentOS5 boxes, with TLS and pam_ldap.
>
> Thanks in advance for your assistance
It's not entirely clear to me what problems you are facing, but the
setup you describe (nss_ldap from nss-pam-ldapd, nslcd and PADL's
pam_ldap) is actually the default on RHEL6.
What exactly does not work for you in your environment?
--
To unsubscribe send an email to
nss-pam-ldapd-users-unsubscribe@lists.arthurdejong.org or see
http://lists.arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd-users/