
Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- From: Thomas Kirchtag <tkircht [at] ipodion.at>
- To: Tony Earnshaw <tonni [at] hetnet.nl>
- Cc: nssldap [at] padl.com
- Subject: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:02:49 +0100
What I don't understand is wha bind_timeout is ignored the way it appears... wouldn't it be preferable to have libnss_ldap retry for a couple of seconds, fall back to secondary and ternary servers and than act as if the policy were set to soft? I don't have a secondary yet (having some problems with replicating userPassword attributes there) but I do intend to setup redundancy and would like a simple, "automatic" failover?
Does this work as intended or is this an open issue with libnss_ldap? Thomas Tony Earnshaw schrieb:
Thomas Kirchtag skrev, on 02-01-2008 20:05:Just so I know what awaits me - could you give me examples of which services will break if I set bind_policy to soft?Actually, it's setting it to hard which breaks things. That's what I was trying to repair in the content of my first mispost.So why should it be set to hard anyway? When soft works for reboots? Because soft never makes nss_ldap retries on a bind failure. Say that you have a primary and a failover URI in ldap.conf, as we have on our 2 k12ltsp (Linux Terminal Server Project) servers:uri ldap://192.168.1.25/ ldap://192.168.0.253/For some reason 192.168.1.25 can't be contacted, nss_ldap should failover to 192.168.0.253. But it won't with bind_policy soft. And all sorts of desktop services make use of nss -> nssldap lookups the whole time; the whole thing comes to a grinding halt (tail -f /var/log/messages" on a RHEL5 server).So one comments out "bind_policy soft" in ldap.conf and gets the default hard_init and everything works again - BUT there's a new kernel update and the machine has to be rebooted (this concerns multiple RHEL5 servers) and one forgets the bind_policy line in ldap.conf and the machines never come up again. So the sysadmin has to go into the server room, gain console access for each of multiple servers, enter run level 1 and fix and reboot. Then afterward change back /etc/ldap.conf to "#bind_policy soft". He is not a happy bunny.One can put most of them into ldap.conf as exceptions: nss_initgroups_ignoreusers root,ldap,named,tonniOnly dbus can't be put in as an exception, since it "invents" a new, unique UID for itself on each reboot. So the machine will hang on dbus.A workaround is to make sure that LDAP is started at run level 1 as one of the first services. dbus, by default, is started in run level 3 as S22. This is easy to do on Red Hat-derived systems, I wouldn't know where to start with, for example, Debian.--Tonni
-- ========================================================= iPodion GmbH Rotensterngasse 20/3 A-1020 Wien, Austria Mobil: +43-660-216 32 98 Tel.:+43-1-216 32 98-0 office [at] iPodion.at Fax: +43-1-216 32 98-28 http://www.iPodion.at =========================================================Achtung: Bitte beachten Sie meine neue Telefonnummer: 0660/2163298
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, (continued)
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?,
Tony Earnshaw
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?,
Thomas Kirchtag
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Jamin W. Collins
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?,
Tony Earnshaw
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Thomas Kirchtag
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Tony Earnshaw
- Message not available
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Tony Earnshaw
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Arthur de Jong
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Tony Earnshaw
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?,
Thomas Kirchtag
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?,
Tony Earnshaw
- Prev by Date: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Next by Date: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Previous by thread: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Next by thread: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?