
Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- From: Arthur de Jong <arthur [at] ch.tudelft.nl>
- To: nssldap <nssldap [at] padl.com>
- Subject: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:26:43 +0100
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:56 +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > I'm now trying gradually to put nss-ldapd in place instead of Red > Hat's $DEITY-awful nss_ldap, but it seems it has a bug with large > Posix groups at the moment (our largest has about 900+ memberUids). This is a known problem with nss-ldapd 0.5 and is fixed (partially) in svn. The attached patch against 0.5 should solve this issue and is tested with groups with up to 1000 members. -- -- arthur - arthur@ch.tudelft.nl - http://ch.tudelft.nl/~arthur --
Attachment:
nss-ldapd-large-groups.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, (continued)
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?,
Tony Earnshaw
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Thomas Kirchtag
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Tony Earnshaw
- Message not available
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Tony Earnshaw
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Arthur de Jong
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Tony Earnshaw
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?, Howard Wilkinson
- Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?,
Tony Earnshaw
- Prev by Date: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Next by Date: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Previous by thread: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?
- Next by thread: Re: [nssldap] No timeout for nss_ldap?